<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: dust?</title> <atom:link href="http://schlachet.net/2004/05/dust/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://schlachet.net/2004/05/dust/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 19:31:47 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Sidney Cammeresi</title><link>http://schlachet.net/2004/05/dust/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link> <dc:creator>Sidney Cammeresi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2004 14:37:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.schlachet.net/?p=355#comment-37</guid> <description>I have this same problem, too, with very small bits of dust which I can&#039;t see by just looking at the negative, but which I can see in an enlargement.  I eventually decided to stop enlarging my negatives and to make only contact prints.  Shortly thereafter, I moved up from 4x5 to 11x14.... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have this same problem, too, with very small bits of dust which I can&#8217;t see by just looking at the negative, but which I can see in an enlargement.  I eventually decided to stop enlarging my negatives and to make only contact prints.  Shortly thereafter, I moved up from 4&#215;5 to 11&#215;14&#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
